<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understand Unit Testing and TDD: Getting Better Code Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2008/12/understand-unit-testing-and-td-getting-better-code-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2008/12/understand-unit-testing-and-td-getting-better-code-coverage/</link>
	<description>All the stuff after "Hello, World!"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Moq to Implement Tests (and Avoid Stubs) &#124; Adventures in HttpContext</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2008/12/understand-unit-testing-and-td-getting-better-code-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Moq to Implement Tests (and Avoid Stubs) &#124; Adventures in HttpContext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=37#comment-57</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] my previous post on understanding TDD I discussed how to analyze existing code for creating unit tests.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my previous post on understanding TDD I discussed how to analyze existing code for creating unit tests.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2008/12/understand-unit-testing-and-td-getting-better-code-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=37#comment-45</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback Sergey.  I&#039;ve been meaning to do a follow up implementing those tests- but got sidetracked with the holidays and work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Normally I would implement stub classes to replace the concrete data tier. However, I&#039;ve been digging into Moq more heavily and it&#039;s replaced the need for stub classes.  I&#039;ll do a follow up soon using this approach, stay tuned!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback Sergey.  I&#8217;ve been meaning to do a follow up implementing those tests- but got sidetracked with the holidays and work.</p>

<p>Normally I would implement stub classes to replace the concrete data tier. However, I&#8217;ve been digging into Moq more heavily and it&#8217;s replaced the need for stub classes.  I&#8217;ll do a follow up soon using this approach, stay tuned!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2008/12/understand-unit-testing-and-td-getting-better-code-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=37#comment-44</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good article, it would be nice to see actual implementation within those test functions! Thanks, you&#039;ve been kicked.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, it would be nice to see actual implementation within those test functions! Thanks, you&#8217;ve been kicked.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

