<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Hate Persistence (but love Azure Table Storage)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/</link>
	<description>All the stuff after "Hello, World!"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:57:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=237#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I&#039;m patiently waiting for EF4 - it keeps me from shooting myself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I&#8217;m patiently waiting for EF4 &#8211; it keeps me from shooting myself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=237#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t agree more really.  Linq to SQL is exactly what we&#039;ve all been looking for in an ORM tool.  It&#039;s simple to setup, &quot;just works&quot;, and no more writing SQL (gasp!).  One complaint - you can&#039;t sync it with the db, oh well.  And just as it started gaining real popularity (StackOverflow uses it), MS pulled support and threw us EF which, while it is good, it is not as simple as L2S.

Azure Table Storage is wonderful.  We have to shift our mindset from using a relational model to that of the flat storage model that huge companies like Amazon &amp; Facebook are using.  But it&#039;s hugely scalable, pretty damn fast, and easy to use since there&#039;s no schema.  On the sort order problem, well, just use Linq to Entities to sort and mangle the data as you please.  Now can someone please write a firefox plugin for azure table/blob/queue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t agree more really.  Linq to SQL is exactly what we&#8217;ve all been looking for in an ORM tool.  It&#8217;s simple to setup, &#8220;just works&#8221;, and no more writing SQL (gasp!).  One complaint &#8211; you can&#8217;t sync it with the db, oh well.  And just as it started gaining real popularity (StackOverflow uses it), MS pulled support and threw us EF which, while it is good, it is not as simple as L2S.</p>
<p>Azure Table Storage is wonderful.  We have to shift our mindset from using a relational model to that of the flat storage model that huge companies like Amazon &amp; Facebook are using.  But it&#8217;s hugely scalable, pretty damn fast, and easy to use since there&#8217;s no schema.  On the sort order problem, well, just use Linq to Entities to sort and mangle the data as you please.  Now can someone please write a firefox plugin for azure table/blob/queue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeHoeff</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>KeHoeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=237#comment-113</guid>
		<description>hey this is a very interesting article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey this is a very interesting article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=237#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Hey Jason, when I was first getting started with ATS I feared the same thing also.  But luckily, someone on &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/778174/are-the-azure-sdk-samples-for-using-sql-data-services-still-relevant-since-the-ac&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;StackOverflow&lt;/a&gt; was able to clear up the confusion.  It&#039;s a marketing blunder- Azure Table Storage is part of the Azure Platform.  What&#039;s going away is a component of Sql Data Services called ACE (Account/Container/Entity) storage.  Sql Data Services is an expansion of the cloud services platform which includes Liver Services and the .NET Service Bus.  The Sql Data Services team is abandoning the ACE approach in favor of the full relational model they want in the cloud, which will be just like running a sql server db in the cloud (with normal sql like syntax, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jason, when I was first getting started with ATS I feared the same thing also.  But luckily, someone on <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/778174/are-the-azure-sdk-samples-for-using-sql-data-services-still-relevant-since-the-ac" rel="nofollow">StackOverflow</a> was able to clear up the confusion.  It&#8217;s a marketing blunder- Azure Table Storage is part of the Azure Platform.  What&#8217;s going away is a component of Sql Data Services called ACE (Account/Container/Entity) storage.  Sql Data Services is an expansion of the cloud services platform which includes Liver Services and the .NET Service Bus.  The Sql Data Services team is abandoning the ACE approach in favor of the full relational model they want in the cloud, which will be just like running a sql server db in the cloud (with normal sql like syntax, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=237#comment-107</guid>
		<description>CouchDB looks pretty slick- definitely a lot of potential.  Plus, doesn&#039;t require the cloud!  A good Json Serializer will make the .NET/Http integration pretty fluid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CouchDB looks pretty slick- definitely a lot of potential.  Plus, doesn&#8217;t require the cloud!  A good Json Serializer will make the .NET/Http integration pretty fluid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Short</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Short</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=237#comment-106</guid>
		<description>I thought MS had stated that the current Azure Table Storage model was going away due to feedback from developers that they wanted a more ADO.NET like experience.  That would mean the one thing you liked is going to get dropped to go back to the status quo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought MS had stated that the current Azure Table Storage model was going away due to feedback from developers that they wanted a more ADO.NET like experience.  That would mean the one thing you liked is going to get dropped to go back to the status quo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=237#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... CouchDB? Yes, it&#039;s young and immature but it has legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; CouchDB? Yes, it&#8217;s young and immature but it has legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotNetShoutout</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/2009/05/i-hate-persistence-but-love-azure-table-storage-with-data-services/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>DotNetShoutout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelhamrah.com/blog/?p=237#comment-103</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rant: I Hate Dealing with Persistence...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from DotNetShoutout...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rant: I Hate Dealing with Persistence&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for submitting this cool story &#8211; Trackback from DotNetShoutout&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
