Comments on: Proposal: Let’s call ASP.NET MVC “.MVC”

By: Channery

Channery — Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:23:05 +0000

Wait, I cannot fathom it being so straihtgfrowrad.

By: Lambada

Lambada — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:19:30 +0000

MVC.NET sounds way better. It’s also close to the naming standards – ASP.NET, Paint.NET etc…

By: bubb-a

bubb-a — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:38:40 +0000

I kind of agree with @bubba – minus the sarcasm.

@bubba – wouldn’t it be better to call Smalltalk implementations of MVC – MVC, considering that Trygve Reenskaug first patterned it in 1979? – maybe Java’s implementation could be… oh… Java MVC – or not quite as late to the game as .MVC?

What about MVC# – since no developer in their right mind would do .Net MVC in vb.net {bahzinga}? (F# still works).

By: bubba

bubba — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:40:51 +0000

I have a better idea. Lets call Java MVC plan o MVC, after all it has been out for 7 years. Perhaps a better name for ASP.NET MVC is late to the game MVC, or just LTTG MVC.

By: DotNetShoutout

DotNetShoutout — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:19:10 +0000

Proposal: Let’s call ASP.NET MVC “.MVC” | Adventures in HttpContext...

Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from DotNetShoutout...